[magick-users] gradient to transparency
Ross Presser
rpresser at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 12:58:26 PDT 2008
I really must remember to use "Reply All" with this list.
Anyhow, I answered my own question: add a "-negate" right after the -gamma
1.0 expression. Then the red is opaque and the white is transparent.
http://rpresser.googlepages.com/test2.html
This is a very interesting effect.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Ross Presser <rpresser at gmail.com> wrote:
> Following along here ... this did not do what I was expecting.
>
> convert \( -size 100x100 gradient:red \) \
> > \( +clone -colorspace Gray -gamma 1.0 \) \
> > +matte -compose Copy_Opacity -composite out.png
> >
>
> The result of this is that the image is pale red and transparent at the
> top, slightly darker red and less transparent in the middle, and totally
> white and opaque at the bottom. I was expecting an image that was opaque and
> red at the top, and completely transparent at the bottom.
>
> I put up a sample HTML page showing this out.png over top of a futurama
> image:
> http://rpresser.googlepages.com/test.html
>
> This may be what Christoph wanted, I dunno. But how would I do the other
> thing? I'm picturing that the red channel value and alpha channel value
> would be identical throughout.
>
More information about the Magick-users
mailing list