[magick-users] Re: Proper Resampling

[Steffan A. Cline]

I thought so too but I was told -density. Have you tried the task to see the
issue I am experiencing?


Thanks

Steffan

---------------------------------------------------------------
T E L  6 0 2 . 5 7 9 . 4 2 3 0 | F A X  6 0 2 . 9 7 1 . 1 6 9 4
Steffan A. Cline
Steffan at ExecuChoice.net                             Phoenix, Az
http://www.ExecuChoice.net                                  USA
AIM : SteffanC          ICQ : 57234309
                                  Lasso Partner Alliance Member
---------------------------------------------------------------



> From: Mikolaj Machowski <mikmach at wp.pl>
> Organization: Nora
> Reply-To: <mikmach at wp.pl>
> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:33:14 +0000 (UTC)
> To: <magick-users at imagemagick.org>
> Subject: [magick-users] Re: Proper Resampling
> 
> Steffan A. Cline scripsit:
>> I am running into an issue where images are uploaded at
>> 612x403 DirectClass 210kb 0.040u 0:01
>> They are run thru -strip and -resample 72z72 but after doing so the images
>> are then 
>> 441x290 DirectClass 142kb 0.020u 0:01
>> At this point I tried to scale the image back to where it was and it is then
>> badly pixelated. It seems to me that sometime ago I saw a hint somewhere
>> that mentions something crafty that needs to be done in the command. I am
>> not able to find it. :( Anyone recall what I am talking about? Do I need to
>> get the size and feed it back into the mogrify command? Anyone have a sample
>> that I can try out?
> 
> Shouldn't you use -density instead of -resample?
> 
> m.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Magick-users mailing list
> Magick-users at imagemagick.org
> http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users