Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

So it maybe problem in 6.8.7-8 and it is fixed in IM 6.8.8.2. If I switch to IM 6.8.8.2 that may solve the problem.

Some area that there is no value for them are filled by virtual pixel, and image has problems in those areas.

Sorry for the bad links, here another one:
correct: http://imgur.com/uxxbu7Y,8Neapcc#0
wrong: http://imgur.com/uxxbu7Y,8Neapcc#1

Thanks for your reply. I upload the result here: https://www.dropbox.com/home/imagemagick_result first one (correct.png), I got it from IM 6.8.0-10 in my mac OSX Lion, which is suppose to be like that. second one(wrong.png), I got it from IM 6.8.7-8 in Parallel (virtual machine ) , Windows 7 on same...

Can someone in ImageMagick please help me with that?
Thanks!

It seems that virtualpixelmethod is not working in fx function anymore. I installed imagemagick 6.8.7-8 on my windows machine, I had imagemagick 6.8.0-10 on my mac. When I run the same command, I am getting different result. the command is: convert -size 1096x1 xc: -virtual-pixel black -fx "xc=...

Hi guys, I have a question for Anthony or other imagemagick guys here. Our Cylinderize function is almost done. We need to check input parameters to make sure they are in the certain range. right now I am doing something like this: assert(radius>0); assert((wrap>=10)&&(wrap<=100)); It is wor...

Thank you so much Fred for your fast reply. I found out what was the problem. I was doing something wrong and it is working great now. I may contact you if I have a question later on.
Thanks again!
~Sara

Our function basic idea is from Fred's scrip for Cylinderize. It is currently taking 7 parameters. 6 parameters are in double type and the one is MagickBooleanType. What do you recommend for this? I was also wondering what is your standard to check the parameter to be in the specific rang inside the...