Search found 96 matches
- 2011-01-17T01:23:17-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: 6.6.7-1 test failure
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6450
6.6.7-1 test failure
Hello all, using the latest svn revision from 6.6.7 I get a test failure: FAIL: tests/validate-formats-in-memory.sh (exit: 134) ===================================================== validate(96083,0x7fff710f4ca0) malloc: *** error for object 0x100a1f388: incorrect checksum for freed object - object ...
- 2011-01-13T09:37:46-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Slow TIFF to PNG conversion
- Replies: 16
- Views: 35842
Re: Slow TIFF to PNG conversion
I used libpng 1.4.4 in all tests. It is most probably caused by the extensive refactoring of png.cWhich version of the PNG library is being used in 6.6.1?
since 6.6.2(?).
Regards, Axel.
- 2011-01-13T07:54:22-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Slow TIFF to PNG conversion
- Replies: 16
- Views: 35842
Re: Slow TIFF to PNG conversion
Can you try with an older ImageMagick version?
I found a dramatic performance drop with PNG when going from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6,
see viewtopic.php?f=2&t=17799
I found a dramatic performance drop with PNG when going from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6,
see viewtopic.php?f=2&t=17799
- 2011-01-10T23:38:13-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Performance drop after upgrade from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6
- Replies: 14
- Views: 28518
Re: Performance drop after upgrade from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6
time ImageMagick-6.6.7/bin/convert logo: -resize 1000% png32:/tmp/logo.png needs more than 3 minutes time ImageMagick-6.6.1-10/bin/convert logo: -resize 1000% png32:/tmp/logo.png runs in less than 10 seconds (same results for "png24" or "png") both IM versions are linked against ...
- 2011-01-10T02:13:38-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Performance drop after upgrade from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6
- Replies: 14
- Views: 28518
Re: Performance drop after upgrade from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6
I used 6.6.7 from svn.
It still takes ages to create a large PNG with my benchmark.
Regards, Axel.
It still takes ages to create a large PNG with my benchmark.
Regards, Axel.
- 2011-01-09T08:29:44-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Performance drop after upgrade from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6
- Replies: 14
- Views: 28518
Re: Performance drop after upgrade from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6
No. I didn't care about the actual file or the actual operation.I hope this is a typo in your command
My point is that generating large PNGs is awfully slow compared to other image formats.
- 2011-01-07T01:44:31-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Performance drop after upgrade from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6
- Replies: 14
- Views: 28518
Re: Performance drop after upgrade from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6
Using png24 or png32 doesn't help. It is still awfully slow: > ImageMagick-6.6.6-10/bin/convert logo: -resize 1000% -bench 5 tif:/tmp/logo.png Performance: 5i 0.427716ips 16.320u 0.19483333428867430359:11.690 > ImageMagick-6.6.6-10/bin/convert logo: -resize 1000% -bench 5 png24:/tmp/logo.png Perform...
- 2011-01-06T10:31:02-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Performance drop after upgrade from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6
- Replies: 14
- Views: 28518
Performance drop after upgrade from 6.6.1 to 6.6.6
Hello all, I got used to this little benchmark convert logo: -resize 1000% -bench 5 /tmp/logo.png When using Version: ImageMagick 6.6.1-10 2011-01-06 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2010 ImageMagick Studio LLC Features: OpenMP OpenCL I get this result: Performance: 5i 0....
- 2010-12-13T01:19:50-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: which libs for clipping path recognition
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20187
Re: which libs for clipping path recognition
Issue is resolved with 6.6.6-5
Thanks, Axel.
Thanks, Axel.
- 2010-12-12T11:13:57-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: which libs for clipping path recognition
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20187
Re: which libs for clipping path recognition
Thank you for your kind correction!
- 2010-12-12T04:05:11-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: which libs for clipping path recognition
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20187
Re: which libs for clipping path recognition
I'm using "identify -verbose" just for demonstration. The problem shows up with a different test easily: > ImageMagick-6.6.6-3/bin/identify -verbose with-clip.jpg | grep -i clip Image: /Users/ar/work/censhare-projects/rewe/with-clip.jpg > ImageMagick-6.6.3-10/bin/identify -verbose with-cli...
- 2010-12-11T02:14:43-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: which libs for clipping path recognition
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20187
Re: which libs for clipping path recognition
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/84530/IM/with-clip.jpg
> ImageMagick-6.6.3-10/bin/identify -verbose with-clip.jpg | grep svg
<svg width="100" height="100">
</svg>
> ImageMagick-6.6.6-3/bin/identify -verbose with-clip.jpg | grep svg
>
> ImageMagick-6.6.3-10/bin/identify -verbose with-clip.jpg | grep svg
<svg width="100" height="100">
</svg>
> ImageMagick-6.6.6-3/bin/identify -verbose with-clip.jpg | grep svg
>
- 2010-12-10T13:37:27-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: which libs for clipping path recognition
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20187
Re: which libs for clipping path recognition
After reading a few other threads in this forum which mention issues with 'iptc' and '8bim' profiles I retried with an older versions, using the same build script as before. 6.6.3-10 works fine 6.6.6-3 doesn't work There is no need to have librsvg or xml support. I suggest the test routines are expa...
- 2010-12-10T01:44:21-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: which libs for clipping path recognition
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20187
Re: which libs for clipping path recognition
(edit) Perhaps this is not a library issue. I debugged further and found that in "property.c" profile=GetImageProfile(image,"8bim"); doesn't return any profile. Does anybody have an idea why this particular "8bim" profile doesn't seem to be extractable? After building &...
- 2010-12-09T01:30:15-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: which libs for clipping path recognition
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20187
which libs for clipping path recognition
Hello all, I have one installation where "identify -verbose with-clip.jpg" doesn't show any clipping path whereas another installation shows such a path on the same test image. The working installation is from MacPorts and uses libexpat and has no librsvg. The failing installation is using...